Some benefits of being a negative person

"There is no evil that lasts a hundred years," an optimist would say. "No body to support it," completes a negative person. Two different ideas in the same situation.

In times when a life with the filters of Instagram, There are those who defend the side of being negative.

How much truth is there in this that optimism makes us naive and sustaining it is a requirement? How much true in what says that among the benefits of being a negative person is self-protection? Let's see…

What is defensive pessimism?

Although it has its benefits, it is important to understand this behavior in depth.

The defensive pessimism, as its name implies, consists of ‘A defense strategy through which we seek to protect ourselves from a potential negative effect’, anticipating that situation, focused from its negative edges.

From this definition, we can stay with the idea of ​​anticipation, which is positive as long as it helps us prepare, and that has nothing to do with having a negative view of life.

Many people tend to emphasize the benefits of being a negative person: thinking badly allows us to better assimilate what does not turn out the way we want. The disadvantage of this idea is that, over time, the person could always see himself as a disadvantage, devaluing his positive aspects and the resources or protective factors that he has.

Even the permanent threat of the negative can lead to anxiety, by recognizing all the unpleasant factors that cannot be controlled, prevented or anticipated.

On the other hand, you also have to have Be careful with the messages you are giving yourself: "I don't think I pass the exam because I'm a loser" speaks to us of much more than defensive pessimism. It also suggests that our self-esteem is being punished.

It may interest you: Automatic negative thoughts, what are they and how to handle them?

Can being a negative person be beneficial?

As we mentioned, sometimes being negative can represent an advantage since it can help us to anticipate. Studies show that people who think more pessimistically are more proactive and take preventive measures regarding situations. Since they are less trusting, this would give them an advantageous situation.

However, in a sustained way over time, it is not optimal since it can cause discouragement, lack of motivation to undertake projects, stay with the problem and not seek the solution, among other things.

We must also think about what happens in the body when we feed on negativity: the brain secretes, in the adrenal glands, hormones such as cortisol and glutamate that, chronically, have important effects.

Let's look at some of the arguments that exist regarding the benefits of being a negative person:

The blow is not so hard

Negative people always think of the worst outcomes and scenarios, which is why expectations are also lower. So when something goes well, they are surprised and enjoy it, and when something goes wrong, they are not so frustrated.

However, it is also necessary to emphasize that this often prevents them from enjoying the processes and feeling illusion, two very important components that are later highly valued, whether or not the expected result has been achieved.

Have your feet on the ground

This can be useful in work settings.

Being governed by negativity would allow you to have a more detailed and realistic vision of certain situations. It is possible that the negative person is also more analytical, so having thought of different scenarios, they would also be more prepared. In this case, being negative is adaptive.

It is necessary to think that when the modes of defense are stiffened, they become impediments. Defense mechanisms must be functional and situational. Instead of defending themselves in advance, it would be helpful if these people could focus more on the resources they have to deal with a situation.

It may interest you: 5 strategies to transform the negative into positive

Does defensive pessimism prevent suffering?

This is a good question to ask yourself when equating negativity with avoidance of suffering. However, the idea requires a nuance: we avoid the shock or surprise of a situation, but the discomfort is permanent, since the inability to think of ourselves as triumphant is as painful as it is frustrating. Anticipating anxiety does not prevent it, since we live it in the same way.

On the other hand, although pessimism has a bad press, the most appropriate solution or proposal does not correspond to excessive optimism: all states that are at one extreme are not good.

Currently, there are different mandates about happiness full time and to see all the good things in life. What we know as toxic positivism. These ideas can be very healthy when they invite us to value the little things of the day to day and to move from the place of the complaint.

However, they become limiting when they prevent us from expressing our emotions and managing them, when we have to "cover up" what we feel because discomfort makes us uncomfortable.

It is important to try to find a middle ground, since in both cases, people are equally overwhelming. It is not about seeing all the colors of roses or all the black colors, but about learning to recognize the nuances that exist in multiple situations. That is, avoid overgeneralization.

There are no benefits of being a negative person if our ideas prevent us from reaching our achievements because they paralyze us, discourage us, or significantly interfere with our daily lives. In this case, it may be appropriate to consult a professional to analyze what beliefs are in the background.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *